Crypto Lead Generation Cost: Real Prices & ROI

TL;DR

• This guide shows real‑world price ranges for acquiring email contacts of crypto project teams, with ROI math and budgeting scenarios.
• You’ll see crypto leads cost by method, from enterprise databases to DIY and grey markets.
• We explain crypto email list price pitfalls and why streaming fresh contacts beats one‑off dumps.
• Budgets map to ROI: price per lead → price per meeting → price per customer.
• Use this to buy crypto leads wisely and model a realistic crypto project contact list price.

Let’s get to the question you ask first and most often: “What’s the price to get email contacts for real crypto project teams?” If you sell to Web3 projects, you can’t afford vague answers. Therefore, layer your pricing analysis with AI‑assisted prospecting and intent signals; so, reps work real demand instead of stale names. Pricing opacity is the F word of the internet because it wastes your time and erodes trust.
This guide does exactly that. It breaks down—method by method—what you can expect to pay for verified contacts belonging to actual crypto project teams. You’ll see concrete price bands, what drives costs up or down, realistic ROI math, and scenario-based budgets for CEOs, founders, and sales leaders across agencies, exchanges, dev shops, security firms, and more. Also, if you need to understand whether buying crypto B2B leads is legal under regulations like GDPR and MiCA, consult the comprehensive guide for clarity on compliance.

Scope note

This guide excludes investor or user email lists. We focus strictly on contacts that belong to crypto project teams (founders and operational decision makers). Additionally, a founder‑level cold outreach audit helps ensure you’re scoring fit, timing, and risk before paying for volume.

Quick Snapshot: Price Ranges by Acquisition Method

• Enterprise SaaS databases (ZoomInfo, similar): usually annual contracts, commonly ~$15k/year+; effective cost ranges ~$0.60–$3.00 per contact, depending on plan, credits, and usage. Best when you need thousands of contacts and deep enrichment.
• Mid market SaaS (Apollo and peers): typically $49–$119 per user/month (annual billing). For emails, the effective per-contact cost can drop to pennies if you actively use it; quality is solid for many use cases.
• Crypto focused vendors (one time or bespoke lists of project teams): often $0.50–$5.00 per contact, priced by specificity, volume, and enrichment; typically more targeted than generic lists.
• Pay as you go, crypto specific streams: $0.50 per project lead, no subscription; free plan often allows 1 lead/day to trial. (Details for LeadGenCrypto below.)
• Freelancers/custom list building: project based quotes or ~$1–$5 per targeted lead (plus management time). Quality varies; vet sourcing methods and samples.
• DIY/manual collection using public sources + APIs + email finders: after tools and labor, ~$1–$10 per lead is common; a structured example shows ~$1.10 per lead for 1,000 contacts when you count API fees and 20 hours of work.
• Grey market sellers (Telegram/Discord): prices are all over the map; legal, deliverability, and reputational risks are high; often the least cost effective once you factor bounces, spam traps, and brand risk.

If that feels like a wide spectrum, you’re right. Like buying a car with trim levels and options, the price depends on how targeted, enriched, recent, and compliant you need the contacts to be. And in B2B crypto outreach, those details directly affect your reply rates, calendar fills, and pipeline quality. That’s why the cheapest “price per email” of around $0.02 can be the most expensive path to revenue. In addition, a diagnostic playbook to remove bottlenecks will align spend with the steps that actually move meetings and payback.

What Counts as a “Crypto Project Team” Contact?

In this guide we’re talking about people who operate the project, not its community or investors:

• Founders / C level (CEO, CTO, COO)
• Business leads (BD, partnerships, growth)
• Marketing leads (CMO, head of marketing, communications)
• Technical decision makers (lead devs, protocol engineers, security leads)

Generic inboxes (e.g., info@, hello@) can serve as a starting point—but your best outcomes come from named role holders with purchase authority or influence. Price increases as your requirements shift from “any working project email” to “named, senior decision maker at the exact segment you sell to,” and again as you demand freshness verification, bounce guarantees, and firmographic enrichment (chain, TVL, headcount, network role, etc.).

LeadGenCrypto • Blog + Newsletter

Own the Crypto Pipeline Weekly

A fast, founder‑friendly briefing for teams selling to crypto projects—pricing benchmarks, crypto lead generation cost insights, proven outreach plays, and ROI tactics you can ship in minutes.

• Fresh breakdowns of project‑team contact pricing across SaaS, pay‑as‑you‑go, and DIY
• Copy‑and‑send cold email hooks, first‑lines, and follow‑ups tuned for project decision‑makers
• Deliverability habits that protect domains and lift replies & meetings
• Weekly signals: launches, listings, migrations—so you email the right teams at the right time

Start My Free Subscription

Preview Recent Issues

No spam • One‑click unsubscribe • Ships weekly

1st Method: Enterprise SaaS Contact Data Platforms

(ZoomInfo, Cognism class, and similar)

Who this fits: Established teams that email thousands of contacts monthly and depend on robust enrichment (org charts, phones, firmographics) plus native CRM/engagement integrations.

Typical pricing & structure:

• Annual contracts starting around ~$15,000 for a professional tier that includes ~5,000 contact credits and ~3 seats. Advanced/Elite tiers run higher (often $25k–$40k/year) as credits, features, and compliance tooling expand. Additional seats often come in around ~$1,500 each. Extra contact credits frequently tier from ~$0.60 down to $0.20 at scale. Effective cost/lead often lands in the $0.60–$3.00 band depending on how fully your team consumes the credits. Minimum term is commonly 1 year.

Why teams pay:

• Coverage & verification. Enterprise platforms emphasize frequent updates and accuracy. Your reps spend less time cleaning lists and more time in quality conversations.
• Targeting depth. Seniority/title filters, industry tags (including blockchain/crypto), company size, and integrations lift productivity—especially for high velocity outbound.

Limits to know:

• Cost efficiency depends on usage. If you only need a few hundred contacts, an enterprise subscription is likely overkill So, consider a human‑automated sales workflow that times outreach to buying triggers instead of just expanding databases.

ROI illustration: Say you pay $15,000 for 5,000 contacts. If 1% of those convert to customers, that’s 50 customers; your data cost per customer is $15,000 ÷ 50 = $300. If a typical deal is worth $10k–$250k, this pencils out quickly provided your team actually works the data—and the data fits your ICP.

2nd Method: Mid Market SaaS (Self Serve)

(Apollo and peers)

Who this fits: Bootstrapped founders, boutique agencies, and lean sales teams that want scalable access to B2B contacts with good (not perfect) enrichment, without enterprise level contracts.

Typical pricing & structure:

• $49–$119 per user/month (annual billing) depending on plan tier. Paid plans often include unlimited email reveals for contacts (subject to fair use), with credit systems mainly for phones or exports.
• If a single user reliably discovers hundreds of viable contacts per month, the effective per email cost becomes pennies.

Trade offs:

• Data quality is generally strong, though coverage in very niche segments can trail the biggest databases. You may need more manual filtering to surface exactly the right crypto projects and roles.

Bottom line: For many Web3 sellers, tools like Apollo provide a sweet spot of capability and cost—especially when you blend them with manual validation and role specific enrichment. Furthermore, a combined outbound–inbound method compounds discovery with content that warms buyers and lowers CPL over time.

3rd Method: Crypto Projects Contact Data SaaS Platforms (LeadGenCrypto & Others)

(Crypto focused pay as you go highlighted below)

This category includes general B2B platforms and crypto specific providers you can operate like SaaS.

LeadGenCrypto (crypto focused, pay as you go)

• Price: $0.50 per lead, no fixed subscription—you pay only when you receive a lead.
• Free plan: 1 lead every 24 hours (manual request), ideal for testing or daily trickle intake.
• Paid delivery: Choose an automatic daily quota (e.g., from 2 to 1,000/day), with pause/resume controls.
• What you get: Verified token project leads in a leads table (website, token address, chain, symbol/name, plus verified emails and Telegram when available), with CSV export and API intake for CRM. A plan card shows your leads/day, price per lead $0.50, and your current balance. Filters & Exceptions help keep relevance high. Moreover, you can apply filters to avoid paying for email addresses of crypto projects that you already contacted. Therefore, you pay only for unique contact details of crypto projects which you have never contacted before. Moreover, an A.C.Q.U.I.R.E.D. operating flywheel ensures those verified contacts route fast to meetings and revenue with compliance baked in.

Who this fits: Teams that want crypto specific contacts without subscriptions or annual contracts, or that prefer to blend a steady feed of project leads with other methods. At $0.50 per lead, budgeting is transparent:

• 20 leads → $10
• 200 leads → $100
• 1,000 leads → $500
• 6,000 leads/quarter → $3,000

And if your team is early, the free 1 lead/day helps you validate messaging before you scale.

Other B2B tools in this bucket

Alternatives like Lusha, Cognism, UpLead, SalesIntel, Clearbit operate on subscriptions and/or credit banks. Some offer pay per contact options with effective costs often around ~$0.50–$1.00 at volume; enterprise tiers can reach into the tens of thousands per year.

Key decision factor: If your top priority is named decision makers inside crypto projects today, crypto specific sources (like LeadGenCrypto) can often deliver higher role relevance for each dollar than broad B2B databases. If you need broader coverage or cross industry targeting, the generalist platforms win on breadth.

4th Method: Crypto Specific Vendors (One Time or Bespoke Lists of Project Teams)

Many providers sell curated, crypto project team lists as a one time purchase or made to order dataset. Expect $0.50–$5.00 per contact depending on your filters (chain, segment, region, seniority) and enrichment fields (title, direct email, Telegram, LinkedIn, company metadata). Reputable vendors focus on team decision makers for blockchain companies and will replace bad emails or offer bounce policies.

One time datasets may claim tens of thousands of records at attractive headline prices; scrutinize them for project team role fields (e.g., CEO Name, CEO Email, Partnerships Email). Lists with explicit role specificity tend to be more usable for B2B selling than generic “company email” rolls.

When to choose: You want fast access to a narrow segment (e.g., “DeFi projects on EVM chains with active TVL and a listed founder email”) and you prefer upfront spend over ongoing contracts. Quality varies, so always request samples and verify the update cadence (more on freshness below).

5th Method: Freelancers & Custom Research (Upwork/Fiverr type gigs)

You can commission custom list building—“Find founders and BD leads for 100 active L2 projects”—and pay a per lead or hourly rate. Expect ~$1–$5 per targeted lead for manual research at scale, or fixed quotes for a milestone (e.g., $100 for a small pilot). Vet how they source emails (email finding tools vs. guessing), insist on samples, and set role specific acceptance criteria up front.

Caveat: Extremely cheap gigs that advertise giant troves of “crypto emails” are often not team contacts, lack verification, and trigger deliverability issues. Favor gigs that explicitly hunt project team decision makers and demonstrate source links for each contact.

6th Method: Manual/DIY Collection (Public Sources, APIs, Finders, Verification)

If you’re time rich or need a surgically precise list, manual is viable—and surprisingly not free once you account for labor, API tiers, and tools.

Typical workflow & cost drivers:

1. Compile projects via aggregator sites/APIs; free tiers cap out quickly, while paid tiers expand throughput. For instance, mid tier API plans commonly run ~$29–$129+/month to pull larger, fresher project sets. Chain explorers (e.g., CoinMarketCap, Coingecko, Etherscan, Bscscan family) also gate higher request volumes at ~$199–$399/month for heavy usage.
2. Extract contact info from each project site (contact page, team bios), community hubs (Discord/Telegram pointers to bizdev@ or partnerships@), and public artifacts (whitepapers, docs). Many projects expose generic addresses; to find named emails you’ll often pivot to LinkedIn + email finders.
3. Role validation & verification: pair name/role with a deliverable email using tools (Hunter, Snov, verifiers). Expect tool subscriptions plus the time to validate each record.

Structured example: Suppose you want 1,000 project contacts. You buy a month of a mid tier aggregator API (say $79–$129), invest ~20 hours of focused work, and pay a developer/researcher fully loaded at $50/hour. That’s $1,000 in labor plus the API fee ($79–$129) = roughly $1,079–$1,129. Effective cost ≈ $1.08–$1.13 per lead, often simplified as ~$1.10/lead for 1,000 contacts—before you add email verification credits or redo stale entries later.

• Pros: total control, current & role exact lists for your ICP, and the highest personalization in outreach.
• Cons: significant time cost, scaling limits, and the need to keep the data fresh.

What Pushes Price Up or Down? (Quality, Verification, Enrichment, Freshness)

Four variables drive the total cost of your contact data—and your results once you hit send:

1. Verification & deliverability. High end sources emphasize verification and bounce replacement; grey market sources rarely do. A >5% bounce rate harms sender reputation and deliverability—an invisible cost that often dwarfs whatever you saved buying cheap data. Investing in verified contacts (and running your own verifier before launch) avoids the costly spiral of spam folder purgatory.
2. Role targeting. Paying more per contact to ensure a named CEO/CTO/Head of Growth beats blasting generic inboxes. Lists with explicit role fields (e.g., CEO Email) are usually far more actionable than unlabeled dumps. However, in crypto industry, crypto projects’ founders and CEOs rarely reveal their names. So, it’s ok to send email to e.g. info@cryptoproject.com address.
3. Enrichment depth. Company URLs (domain), token symbols and names, chain(s), unlock personalization (“Hello [domain] team — saw your [token symbol] update last week”). Strong enrichment boosts reply and meeting rates, improving ROI even if cost per lead is higher.
4. Data freshness. Crypto moves fast. Projects pivot, rebrand, migrate chains, or go dormant. Favor datasets with recent update stamps or ongoing refresh cycles, or build refresh into your workflow. Fresher data costs more to maintain—and it’s worth it.

Compliance, Risk, and the “Hidden” Costs You Won’t See on a Price Tag

• Privacy & anti spam rules. Outreach to business emails is regulated—requirements differ by region (e.g., opt out mechanisms, lawful basis, content relevance, honoring unsubscribes). Non compliance can lead to warnings, fines, and reputational damage. You—the sender—own compliance, regardless of where the data came from.
• Deliverability risks. Purchased lists sometimes include spam traps. Warm up domains, send in small batches, and monitor bounces/complaints. Consider a separate sending domain to protect your main domain’s reputation.
• Grey market pitfalls. Informal Telegram/Discord sellers may peddle stale, scraped, or illicitly obtained data. Even if the price seems low, high bounce rates, spam complaints, and legal exposure make these among the least cost effective options in practice.

How to Budget: From “Price per Lead” to “Price per Meeting” to “Price per Customer”

Don’t stop at cost per contact. Translate spend to meetings and customers. Therefore, a multi‑chain nurture blueprint can turn cold lists into warm demand, lifting meetings per 100 sends without spiking spend.

1. Define your funnel metrics (use recent campaign data or a conservative forecast):

   • Open rate (with warmed domains and personalized first lines)
   • Positive reply rate (not “unsubscribe”—actual interest)
   • Booked meeting rate (from positives)
   • Close rate (from meetings or from communication process)

2. Compute limits you’re willing to pay per stage:

   • Max cost per meeting = expected deal value × close rate × margin × confidence factor
   • Max cost per lead = max cost per meeting × (booked meetings ÷ leads)

Worked example (double checkable math):

• Average deal value: $20,000
• Gross margin: 70% → contribution per deal $14,000
• Close rate from first meeting: 20% → $2,800 expected contribution per meeting
• Confidence factor (to de risk estimates): 50% → $1,400 validated value per meeting

Therefore, it’s rational to spend up to $1,400 per booked meeting. If your sequence books meetings from 5% of contacted decision makers, then your max cost per lead can be $1,400 × 0.05 = $70.

Notice how even relatively high per lead pricing (e.g., $5 for bespoke, highly targeted contacts) can be outstanding ROI if you’re booking meetings at 5%+ with that data quality. Conversely, if you buy $0.002 contacts of dubious quality and book meetings at 0.01%, your blended cost per meeting can shoot past the justified threshold once you add domain warm up, deliverability repairs, and the opportunity cost of time.

Scenario Based Buying Plans (Forward Looking)

1) Solo founder or freelancer validating outbound

• Goal: 30–60 qualified project conversations this quarter.
• Pick: Start with LeadGenCrypto’s free 1 lead/day to test hooks; top up at $0.50/lead for more volume. Layer a mid market SaaS (e.g., Apollo class) for discovery and role filtering. Expect to spend $300–$1,000 this quarter to reach a few hundred named contacts selectively and book 10–15 meetings if messaging resonates.

2) Agency sales manager building a steady pipe

• Goal: 100–200 meetings/quarter across CEX listings, PR, or security audits.
• Pick: Run a hybrid: a daily feed of token project leads at $0.50 each (budget $500–$1,500/month), plus mid market SaaS seats for your SDRs. Use freelancers for gap lists in niche segments (e.g., “active bridges on non EVM chains”). Budget $2k–$5k/month inclusive of tools and data.

3) Venture backed provider needing scale and compliance

• Goal: Feed a 6–10 rep team with thousands of new team contacts each month, enrich to the hilt, and integrate tightly with CRM and SEP.
• Pick: Enterprise SaaS for scale and verification, backed by internal enrichment and manual QA on Tier 1 accounts. Supplement with crypto specific feeds at $0.50/lead for freshness and role depth. Annual data budget typically $15k–$60k, justified by pipeline velocity and compliance posture. Meanwhile, a go‑to‑market playbook for services helps position offers with stablecoin‑ready pricing and measurable KPIs that convert those meetings.

4) Research heavy firms with dev resources

• Goal: Ongoing mapping of protocol ecosystems; gold standard accuracy for technical roles (core devs, security contacts).
• Pick: Invest in manual collection augmented by aggregator and explorer APIs, email finding and verification tools, and a clear refresh cadence. Your effective cost will often be ~$1–$10 per lead depending on staff time and scope—but the precision can pay off in response and partnership quality.

The Sub Totals You Shouldn’t Ignore (Hidden but Real)

When comparing “cheap list” vs. “quality data,” fold in these line items:

• Email warm up and infrastructure (domains, mailboxes, rotators)
• Verification passes before each big send
• Copy/sequence personalization time (short, specific, value first)
• SDR time on dead records (the silent drain cheap data creates)
• Deliverability rescue if a big blast goes sideways (warm ups, new domains, waiting periods)

A dataset that costs $0.50 but saves two hours of SDR time per 100 contacts can be cheaper than a $0.02 list that clogs your pipeline and burns domain reputation—a classic case of price vs. cost.

Due Diligence Checklist (Use This Before You Buy)

1. Update cadence: “When was this list last refreshed?” Prefer recent timestamps or rolling updates.
2. Verification: “What bounce rate do you warrant? Do you replace invalids?” In addition, adopting ODF‑10 email sequences keeps outreach lean and timely, improving meetings per thousand emails.
3. Enrichment: “What context is included (blcokchain type, website, token symbol, token name, etc.)?” Enrichment drives replies.
4. Compliance stance: “How is data sourced? Any documentation?” You own the send side obligations—opt out, relevance, sender identity, and record keeping.
5. Test first: Pilot with 100 contacts, measure bounces/replies/meetings, and scale or pivot.

How Today’s Choices Set You Up for Tomorrow (Forward Thinking Moves)

• Build a living contact graph. Whichever source you choose, design a refresh rhythm (e.g., quarterly) and tag source + date at the record level. Over time, your CRM becomes your most accurate crypto project rolodex.
• Blend streams. Combine a crypto specific pay as you go feed (steady, verifiable) with SaaS discovery and manual Tier 1 curation. This multi source approach protects you from platform changes and keeps lists fresh.
• Design for deliverability resilience. Maintain warmed sending domains, rotate intelligently, and batch test every new dataset. Cheap lists can sit in a quarantine lane until they prove themselves.
• Automate responsibly. Use APIs for intake (where available) to standardize formats, prevent duplicates, and enforce role filters at the gate.
• Track outcomes by source. Attribute meetings and revenue back to each data source. You’ll quickly see where $0.50 truly beats $0.02, and where enterprise enrichment earns its keep.

Crypto lead generation costs

Use these skimmable tables to compare options and budget realistically. Also, keep in mind that crypto email list price ≠ outcome; optimize total crypto lead generation cost to ROI. Tables help teams debate facts instead of anecdotes.

Method vs. Price vs. Risk

Method	Typical Price Band	Best For	Primary Risks / Notes
Enterprise SaaS (ZoomInfo class)	$15k–$40k/yr; $0.60–$3.00 effective per lead	6–10+ reps; deep enrichment & integrations	Overbuying credits; niche crypto coverage gaps; requires high utilization
Mid‑market SaaS (Apollo class)	$49–$119/user/mo; pennies effective	Solo/Boutique teams	Needs filter tuning; verify before launch; titles vary in Web3
Crypto pay‑as‑you‑go stream	$0.50/lead; 1 free/day	Predictable daily intake; crypto‑native roles	Configure dedupe/exclusions; still verify a sample
Crypto vendors (one‑time/bespoke lists)	$0.50–$5.00/contact	Narrow segments; fast starts	Update cadence varies; demand role fields and bounce replacement
Freelancers / custom research	~$1–$5/lead	Niche segments; proof‑of‑concept	Management overhead; quality variance; insist on samples and source links
Manual / DIY	~$1–$10/lead; case: ~$1.10 @ 1,000 leads	Tier‑1 precision; research workflows	Time‑intensive; requires refresh cadence; hidden verification costs

Scenario Budgets & Intake Targets

Scenario	Monthly/Quarterly Budget	Intake Target (Accepted)	Notes & ROI Handling
Solo founder / freelancer	$300–$1,000/quarter	200–600/qtr	Use stream + 1 SaaS seat; validate message with 1 free/day; protect domain health
Agency sales manager	$2k–$5k/month	1,000–3,000/qtr	Hybrid intake; add freelancers for non‑EVM gaps; weekly verification samples
Venture‑backed provider (6–10 reps)	$15k–$60k/year	2,000–6,000/month	Enterprise SaaS + crypto stream; strict attribution; QA Tier‑1 accounts
Research‑heavy firm with dev resources	$1–$10/lead variable	500–2,000/qtr	DIY precision; automate refresh; stream keeps calendars full while lists evolve

Urgent Truth

Tables simplify planning, but your crypto leads cost should always be validated against booked meetings per 100 sends and payback periods.

FAQ

Q: What’s the cheapest way to get crypto project contact that actually works?
A: If you need some data for free, a crypto specific 1 lead/day free plan is the lowest risk on ramp. From there, $0.50/lead pay as you go is a realistic, predictable price point—especially when combined with a mid market SaaS seat for discovery and manual checks on strategic accounts.

Q: Why would I ever pay enterprise pricing if mid market tools exist?
A: For scale, coverage, integrations, and compliance—and to save SDR hours. If you’ll truly use thousands of contacts/month and need tight CRM/SEP workflows, enterprise platforms often return their cost in productivity and consistent enrichment.

Q: How much should I budget per month?
A: The budget can vary:

• Lean team validating outbound: $100–$300/month (crypto specific pay as you go + one SaaS seat).
• Growing sales org (2–4 SDRs): $2,000–$5,000/month in data/tools blended across pay as you go feeds, SaaS seats, and curated lists.
• Enterprise motion: $15,000–$60,000/year (and up) for enterprise SaaS plus supplementary crypto specific sources and manual enrichment budget.

Q: Isn’t DIY basically free?
A: Not once you price time, APIs, and verification. A grounded example puts 1,000 contacts at ~$1.10 each, assuming 20 hours of labor plus API costs—before ongoing refresh. DIY shines for precision; it’s not “free.”

Method by Method Price & Value Summary (for quick budgeting)

• Enterprise SaaS (ZoomInfo class):
  • Price: Typically $15k–$40k/year, credits/seat structure; $0.60–$3.00/lead effective.
  • Best for: High volume teams that need enrichment, integrations, and update cadence.
• Mid market SaaS (Apollo class):
  • Price: $49–$119 per user/month (annual); effective email cost pennies with active use.
  • Best for: Lean teams seeking a robust database without enterprise lock in.
• Crypto specific pay as you go (LeadGenCrypto):
  • Price: $0.50 per lead, no subscription; free plan at 1 lead/day; automated quotas 2–1,000/day with pause/resume; CSV export & API.
  • Best for: Direct, predictable access to verified token project contacts without contracts; complements SaaS discovery.
• Crypto specific vendors (one time/bespoke lists):
  • Price: $0.50–$5.00 per contact, depending on specificity and enrichment.
  • Best for: Fast access to a defined segment (e.g., DeFi founders in EMEA).
• Freelancers/custom research:
  • Price: ~$1–$5 per lead or project quotes; quality varies—vet sourcing and role specificity.
  • Best for: Niche targets and proof of concepts where personalization matters.
• Manual/DIY:
  • Price: After tools and labor, often ~$1–$10 per lead; structured example lands ~$1.10 for 1,000 contacts.
  • Best for: Precision lists, internal research workflows, and high stakes accounts.

Choose the blend that meets your stage, your quota, and your tolerance for risk. And never forget: in outbound to crypto projects, data quality is destiny—and the best measure of cost is how quickly it turns into a warm reply, a booked call, and revenue.